fhu x icon close

Achievement

Introduction

The mission of Freed-Hardeman University (FHU) is to “help students develop their God-given talents for His glory by empowering them with an education that integrates Christian faith, scholarship and service.”

This mission is reflected in FHU’s 150-year heritage and frames the University’s criteria for evaluating student success. FHU identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to its mission, the nature of the students it serves, and the kinds of programs it offers.

In addition, the Institution uses multiple measures to document the success of its students. The following is data we track to hold ourselves accountable to meeting these goals:

A large, enthusiastic crowd of students wearing mostly black cheers and celebrates in the bleachers at an indoor sports event. One child in a costume stands out among the crowd.
Student Achievement Criteria Results
Student Success Indicator Description Fall 2021 Values Fall 2022 Values Fall 2023 Values Acceptability Threshold Aspirational Goal
(1) Retention Rates: First-Time, Full-time, Undergraduate, Degree-seeking, Fall-to-Fall This percentage represents first-time, full-time undergraduates retained fall-to-fall (Source: IPEDS). 85% 82% 81% 72% 87%
(2) Retention Rates: Non-First-Time, Full-time, Undergraduate, Degree-seeking, Fall-to-Fall This percentage represents non-first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates retained fall-to-fall (Source: Internal). 90% 86% 91% 84% 94%
(3) Retention Rates: Undergraduate (Race) This percentage represents degree-seeking undergraduates retained fall-to-fall by race (Source: Internal). Hispanic/Latino

50% (1/2)

 

American Indian

69% (9/13)

 

Asian

70% (7/10)

 

Black

82% (32/39)

 

Hawaiian / Pacific

100% (1/1)

 

White

88% (793/900)

 

Two or more

75% (6/8)

 

International

85% (17/20)

 

Unknown

81% (26/32)

Hispanic/Latino

100% (1/1)

 

American Indian

78% (7/9)

 

Asian

90% (9/10)

 

Black

63% (27/43)

 

Hawaiian / Pacific

100% (1/1)

 

White

85% (831/979)

 

Two or more

75% (6/8)

 

International

71% (15/21)

 

Unknown

83% (30/36)

Hispanic/Latino

50% (1/2)

 

American Indian

88% (7/8)

 

Asian

77% (10/13)

 

Black

77% (37/48)

 

Hawaiian / Pacific

0% (0/1)

 

White

88% (806/916)

 

Two or more

91% (10/11)

 

International

91% (10/11)

 

Unknown

85% (44/52)

82%  92%
(4) Retention Rates: Undergraduate (Socio-Economic Status) This percentage represents degree-seeking undergraduates retained fall-to-fall by socio-economic status (Source: Internal). $0 – $30K

79% (118/149)

 

$30K – $48K

83% (74/89)

 

$48K – $75$

83% (126/151)

 

$75K – $110K

90% (206/230)

 

$110K plus

91% (324/356)

 

Not Reported

88% (44/50)

$0 – $30K

78% (103/132)

 

$30K – $48K

85% (78/92)

 

$48K – $75$

83% (121/145)

 

$75K – $110K

88% (198/226)

 

$110K plus

87% (372/430)

 

Not Reported

66% (55/83)

$0 – $30K

80% (148/184)

 

$30K – $48K

87% (71/82)

 

$48K – $75$

83% (120/145)

 

$75K – $110K

92% (185/145)

 

$110K plus

89% (392/438)

 

Not Reported

N/A

82%  92%
(5) Retention Rates: Undergraduate (Gender)

 

This percentage represents degree and certificate seeking graduates retained fall-to-fall by gender (Source: Internal).

 

Male

88% (416/475)

 

Female

87% (476/550)

Male

84% (410/491)

 

Female

84% (517/617)

Male

87% (420/481)

 

Female

88% (495/570)

82% 92%
(6) Retention Rates: Graduate (Overall) This percentage represents part-time, full-time, degree-, and certificate-seeking graduates retained fall-to-fall (Source: Internal).  71% 72% 73% 58% 68%
(7) Retention Rates: Graduate (Race) This percentage represents degree and certificate seeking graduates retained fall-to-fall by race (Source: Internal). Hispanic/Latino

(n/a) (0/0)

 

American Indian

50% (1/2)

 

Asian

(n/a) (0/0)

 

Black

70% (99/141)

 

White

72% (105/146)

 

Two or more

100% (2/2)

 

International

50% (1/2)

 

Unknown

69% (20/29)

Hispanic/Latino

(n/a) (0/0)

 

American Indian

100% (1/1)

 

Asian

100% (1/1)

 

Black

62% (103/165)

 

White

74% (106/144)

 

Two or more

67% (2/3)

 

International

83% (5/6)

 

Unknown

34% (14/41)

Hispanic/Latino

57% (4/7)

 

American Indian

100% (2/3)

 

Asian

50% (1/2)

 

Black

69% (109/158)

 

White

71% (102/143)

 

Two or more

100% (2/2)

 

International

86% (6/7)

 

Unknown

38% (3/8)

58%  68%
(8) Retention Rates: Graduate (Socio-Economic Status) This percentage represents degree and certificate seeking graduates retained fall-to-fall by socio-economic status (Source: Internal). $0 – $30K

73% (66/91)

 

$30K – $48K

63% (31/49)

 

$48K – $75K

82% (32/39)

 

$75K – $110K

82% (18/22)

 

$110K plus

69% (9/13)

 

Not Reported 66% (72/109)

$0 – $30K

60% (52/86)

 

$30K – $48K

60% (37/62)

 

$48K – $75K

60% (29/48)

 

$75K – $110K

76% (26/34)

 

$110K plus

89% (16/18)

 

Not Reported 64% (73/114)

$0 – $30K

70% (133/192)

 

$30K – $48K

65% (33/51)

 

$48K – $75K

75% (24/32)

 

$75K – $110K

71% (22/31)

 

$110K plus

71% (12/17)

 

Not Reported 50% (1/2)

58% 68%
(9) Retention Rates: Graduate (Gender) This percentage represents degree and certificate seeking graduates retained fall-to-fall by gender (Source: Internal). Male

68% (84/123)

 

Female

72% (144/200)

Male

66% (80/122)

 

Female

64% (153/240)

Male

68% (80/117)

 

Female

70% (145/207)

58%  68%
(10) Participation in High Impact Practices (HIPs) * This percentage represents seniors who participated in two or more HIPs (Source: NSSE). NSSE not administered  79% NSSE not administered 66% 86%
(11) Participation in Internships * This percentage represents seniors who participated in internships, co-op, field experience, student teaching, or clinical placement (Source: NSSE). NSSE not administered 58% NSSE not administered 52% 72%
(12) Graduation Rates: Undergraduate (Overall) This percentage represents the six-year undergraduate graduation rate (Source: IPEDS).  65% 70% 68% 49% 72%
(13) Graduation Rates: Undergraduates (Race) This percentage represents the six-year undergraduate graduation rate by race (Source: IPEDS). Hispanic/Latino

25% (2/8)

 

American Indian

(n/a) (0/0)

 

Asian

100% (2/2)

 

Black

36% (4/11)

 

 

 

 

White

67% (172/257)

 

Two or more

67% (2/3)

 

International

100% (2/2)

 

Unknown

56% (5/9)

Hispanic/Latino

80% (4/5)

 

American Indian

100% (1/1)

 

Asian

67% (2/3)

 

Black

42% (5/12)

 

Hawaiian/Pac

100% (1/1)

 

White

71% (178/249)

 

Two or more

100% (6/6)

 

International

33% (2/6)

 

Unknown

55%(26/47)

Hispanic/Latino

0% (0/3)

 

American Indian

100% (2/2)

 

Asian

100% (1/1)

 

Black

36% (5/14)

 

Hawaiian/Pac

NA (0/0)

 

White

70% (187/269)

 

Two or more

100% (2/2)

 

International

80% (4/5)

 

Unknown

75% (18/24)

49%  72%
(14) Graduation Rates: Undergraduate (Socio-Economic Status) This percentage represents the six-year undergraduate graduation rate by socio-economic status (Source: Internal). $0 – $30K

38% (21/55)

 

$30K – $48K

63% (19/30)

 

$48K – $75K

67% (26/39)

 

$75K – $110K

70% (52/74)

 

$110K plus

76% (67/88)

 

Not Reported

67% (4/6)

$0 – $30K

40% (16/40)

 

$30K – $48K

79% (23/28)

 

$48K – $75K

73% (37/51)

 

$75K – $110K

73% (62/85)

 

$110K plus

79% (79/100)

 

Not Reported

30% (6/20)

$0 – $30K

53% (20/38)

 

$30K – $48K

54% (15/28)

 

$48K – $75K

55% (34/62)

 

$75K – $110K

84% (59/70)

 

$110K plus

75% (78/104)

 

Not Reported

69% (9/13)

49% 72%
(15) Graduation Rates: Undergraduate (Gender) This percentage represents the six-year undergraduate graduation rate by Gender (Source: IPEDS). Male

63% (76/120)

 

Female

66% (113/172)

Male

69% (92/133)

 

Female

69% (131/191)

Male

68% (97/143)

 

Female

69% (118/172)

49% 72%
(20) National Exam Results: Counseling This percentage represents the overall pass rate of the Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Exam (CPCE) (Source: CPCE). 86% 92% 88% 90% 100%
(21) State Licensure Results: Education This percentage represents the undergraduate and graduate pass rates for the Praxis Tests (Source: Praxis). 85% 100% 96% 98% 100%
(22) State Licensure Results: Nursing This percentage represents the overall pass rate for the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX) (Source: NCLEX). 91% 84.2% (32/38) 86.5% (32/37) 85% 100%
(23) Undergraduate Job Placement Rate * This percentage represents the undergraduate job placement rate for all students one year after graduation (Source: Internal).

 

[The percentage of students employed in the field has also been provided for informational purposes.]

91%

 

[82% in field]

87%

 

[72% in field]

94%

 

[81% in field]

90%

 

[75% in field]

100%
(24) Graduate School Placement Rate This percentage represents graduate school acceptance rates within one year of graduation (Source: Internal). 99% 94% 100% 90% 100%
(25) Spiritual Environment This average rating represents undergraduate student assessment of the overall spiritual environment, which supports the development of faith. Scale is 1 [“Poor”] to 4 [“Excellent”] (Source: FHU Exit Survey). 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.37 3.57
(26) Religious Service Attendance * This percentage represents undergraduate students attending religious services at least half the time (Source: FHU One-Year Alumni Survey).

 

[The percentage of students affiliated with the churches of Christ has been provided for informational purposes.]

93% Total

 

[98% CoC

Affiliation]

91% Total

 

[96% CoC

Affiliation]

89% Total

 

[86% CoC

Affiliation]

94% Total 100% Total
(27) Incorporation of Faith This average rating represents undergraduate student assessment of the incorporation of faith into their everyday lives. Scale is 1 [“None”] to 4 [“Much”] (Source: FHU Exit Survey). 3.3 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.5
(28) Growth of Faith This percentage represents undergraduate student assessment of their growth in faith during their Freed-Hardeman experience. Note: The percentage reflects students responding with “Yes” (Source: FHU Exit Survey). 91% 89% 91% 90% 100%
(29) Weekly Hours of Community/Volunteer Service * This value indicates the number of hours per week FHU senior respondents were engaged in community service or volunteer work (Source: NSSE). 2.6

Hours per week

2.9

Hours per week

 2.9

Hours per week

2.6

Hours per week

3.6

Hours per week

(30) Preparation for Service to Others This average rating represents undergraduate student assessment of how well FHU has prepared them to serve others after graduation. Scale is 1 [“None”] to 4 [“Much”] (Source: FHU Exit Survey). 3.33 3.33 3.6 3.27 4.00
(31) Student Loan Default Rate This percentage represents total student loan default rate (Source: National Student Loan Data System). 3.10% 2.20% 0% 11.10% 2.60%

* indicates data collected every other year

 

Acceptability Thresholds and Aspirational Goals
Student Success Indicator

 

Acceptability Threshold Aspirational Goal
(1) Retention Rates: FTF – Degree Seeking-Undergraduates This threshold is a five-year average of Title-IV participating, four-year and above institutions in the United States. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the average for this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2012 through 2016 cohorts). This goal is a five-year average of Freed-Hardeman’s top five benchmark institutions. (See “Benchmark Institutions” section for more information.) Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the top tier institutions in this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years. (Source: IPEDS—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(2) Retention Rates: Non-FTF – Degree Seeking-Undergraduates This threshold is a five-year average of Non-FTF Degree-Seeking Undergraduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(3) Retention Rates: Undergraduate (Race) This threshold is a five-year average of Degree-Seeking Undergraduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(4) Retention Rates: Undergraduate (Socio-Economic Status) This threshold is a five-year average of Degree-Seeking Undergraduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(5) Retention Rates: Undergraduate (Gender) This threshold is a five-year average of Degree-Seeking Undergraduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(6) Retention Rates: Graduate (Overall) This threshold is a five-year average of graduate students at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(7) Retention Rates: Graduate (Race) This threshold is a five-year average of graduate students at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).  Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(8) Retention Rates: Graduate (Socio-Economic Status) This threshold is a five-year average of graduate students at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(9) Retention Rates: Graduate (Gender) This threshold is a five-year average of graduate students at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012 through 2016 cohorts).
(10) Participation in High Impact Practices This threshold is an average of senior respondents in Southeast Private institutions participating in the NSSE. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed this average. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially (Source: NSSE—Spring 2018).  Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 20 percentage points above the NSSE average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially (Source: NSSE—Spring 2018).
(11) Participation in Internships This threshold is an average of senior respondents in Southeast Private institutions participating in the NSSE. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed this average. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially (Source: NSSE—Spring 2018). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 20 percentage points above the NSSE average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University evaluates this goal biennially (Source: NSSE—Spring 2018).
(12) Graduation Rates: Undergraduate (Overall) This threshold is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Title-IV participating, four-year and above institutions in the United States. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the average for this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts). This goal is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Freed-Hardeman’s top five benchmark institutions. (See “Benchmark Institutions” section for more information.) Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the top tier institutions in this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts).
(13) Graduation Rates: Undergraduates (Race) This threshold is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Title-IV participating, four-year and above institutions in the United States. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the average for this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts). This goal is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Freed-Hardeman’s top five benchmark institutions. (See “Benchmark Institutions” section for more information.) Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the top tier institutions in this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts).
(14) Graduation Rates: Undergraduate (Socio-Economic Status) This threshold is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Title-IV participating, four-year and above institutions in the United States. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the average for this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts). This goal is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Freed-Hardeman’s top five benchmark institutions. (See “Benchmark Institutions” section for more information.) Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the top tier institutions in this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts).
(15) Graduation Rates: Undergraduate (Gender) This threshold is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Title-IV participating, four-year and above institutions in the United States. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the average for this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts). This goal is a five-year average of the 150 percent graduation rate for Freed-Hardeman’s top five benchmark institutions. (See “Benchmark Institutions” section for more information.) Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the top tier institutions in this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: IPEDS—2007 through 2011 cohorts).
(16) Graduation Rates: Graduate (Overall) This threshold is a three-year average of degree-seeking graduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts).

 

Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional three-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts).
(17) Graduation Rates: Graduate (Race) This threshold is a three-year average of degree-seeking graduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional three-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts).
(18) Graduation Rates: Graduate (Socio-Economic Status) This threshold is a three-year average of degree-seeking graduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional three-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts).
(19) Graduation Rates: Graduate (Gender) This threshold is a three-year average of degree-seeking graduates at FHU. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be 10 percentage points above the institutional three-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2008-2009 through 2010-2011 cohorts).
(20) National Exam Results: Counseling This threshold is a three-year average of the Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Exam (CPCE) scores. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2015-2016 through 2017-2018 cohorts).

 

Passage of the Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Exam (CPCE) demonstrates that students are prepared to accumulate supervised hours and succeed on the National Counselor Exam (NCE). It is Freed-Hardeman’s goal that all counseling majors pass the CPCE.
(21) State Licensure Results: Education This threshold is a five-year average of Praxis pass rates for the State of Tennessee. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2013-2014 through 2017-2018 cohorts). This percentage represents Freed-Hardeman’s goal for every education student who is pursuing licensure to successfully complete the required Praxis exams.

 

(22) State Licensure Results: Nursing This threshold is the minimum requirement for the Tennessee State Board of Nursing in order for a university to maintain good standing. This percentage represents Freed-Hardeman’s goal for every nursing major who completes the course requirements for the program to successfully complete the NCLEX exam on the first attempt.
(23) Undergraduate Job Placement Rate This threshold is a three-year rolling rate of employed bachelor degree recipients as published annually by the U.S. Department of Labor. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed this base employment rate. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially (Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor – Bureau of Labor Statistics—October 2017). This percentage represents Freed-Hardeman’s goal for all undergraduate students seeking employment to be employed full-time within one year after graduation. (Students not seeking employment and/or enrolled in graduate school have been excluded.)  [Core Mission Indicator]
(24) Graduate School Placement Rate Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed a graduate school placement rate of >90 percent and uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. The institution believes this value is an appropriate threshold based on purpose, historical data, and its relationship to the indicator’s aspirational goal. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially. This percentage represents Freed-Hardeman’s goal for every undergraduate who applies for graduate school to be accepted into at least one graduate program.  [Core Mission Indicator]
(25) Spiritual Environment This threshold is a five-year average of FHU undergraduate student respondents. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012-2013 cohort through 2015-2016 cohort). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be .20 points above the five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to the 1-4 scale and historical data.  Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012-2013 cohort through 2015-2016 cohort).
(26) Religious Service Attendance This indicator was first assessed with the 2015-2016 cohort and is assessed biennially. A threshold will be formally adopted once sufficient data has been collected to compute a three-year average. (Source: Internal). It is Freed-Hardeman’s goal that every student will indicate that he or she attends religious services at least half the time.
(27) Incorporation of Faith This threshold is a five-year average of FHU undergraduate student respondents. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012-2013 cohort through 2015-2016 cohort). Freed-Hardeman has identified the aspirational goal for this indicator to be .20 points above the five-year average. The Institution believes this goal is appropriately balanced between aggressiveness and obtainability in relation to 1-4 scale and historical data. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012-2013 cohort through 2015-2016 cohort).
(28) Growth of Faith This indicator was first assessed with the 2016-2017 cohort. A threshold will be formally adopted once sufficient data has been collected to compute a three-year average (Source: Internal). It is Freed-Hardeman’s goal that every student will indicate that he or she has experienced growth in faith as a result of his or her Freed-Hardeman experience.  [Core Mission Indicator]
(29) Weekly Hours of Community/Volunteer Service This threshold is a three-year average of FHU senior respondents. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially (Source: NSSE—2015 through 2017 Spring Collection). This goal is a three-year average of senior respondents in Southeast Private institutions participating in the NSSE. Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed this average. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold biennially (Source: NSSE—2015 through 2017 Spring Collection).
(30) Preparation for Service to Others This threshold is a five-year average of FHU undergraduate student respondents. Freed-Hardeman uses this value to identify negative trends that warrant intervention. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: Internal—2012-2013 cohort through 2015-2016 cohort). It is Freed-Hardeman’s goal that every student will indicate that he or she has been prepared by FHU, to the fullest extent possible, to serve others.  [Core Mission Indicator]
(31) Student Loan Default Rate This threshold is a five-year average of the national student loan cohort default rate. The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: National Student Loan Data System—2012 through 2016 cohorts). This goal is a three-year average of the student loan default rate for Freed-Hardeman’s top five benchmark institutions. (See “Benchmark Institutions” section for more information.) Freed-Hardeman strives to exceed the top tier institutions in this group. Note: The University reevaluates this threshold every five years (Source: National Student Loan Data System—2014 through 2016 cohorts).